![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgTFjR_k9jIkCD5osVEeR6agfgV2HVa6PJU9RgZZkR1WKfJtX3cO2bX65LAYRHXTtmbvsG7AvhnE-SI8n_ivdXSiFu8UZ0a-NET_cECaAmgmiguKBaIt2EwWW6mP91k4P0Qp3StNSQD6gM/s320/images+%25285%2529.jpeg)
The category “Tantra” is a basic and familiar one today
in the vocabulary of most scholars of religions and generally considered one of
the most important and controversial forms of Asian religion. In academic discourse,
Tantra usually refers to a specific brand of religious practice common to the
Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain traditions since at least the seventh century; above
all, it is identified as a particularly radical and dangerous practice that
involves activities normally prohibited in mainstream society, such as sexual
intercourse with lower-class partners and consumption of meat and wine. Not
surprisingly, given the rather racy nature of the subject, interest in Tantra
has skyrocketed in the past two decades in both the popular and scholarly
imaginations. On the academic level, Tantra has become one of the hottest
topics in the field of South Asian studies, generating a large body of
provocative (and often controversial) new scholarship. Still more strikingly,
Tantra has also become an object of fascination in the popular imagination,
where usually it is defined as “sacred sex” and often is confused with Eastern
sexual manuals such as the Kร ma Sรtra and Western occult traditions such as Aleister Crowley’s “sex
magic.”
Tantra was quickly singled out as the most horrifying and
degenerate aspect of the Indian mind. Identified as the extreme example of all
the polytheism and licentiousness believed to have corrupted Hinduism, Tantra
was something “too abominable to enter the ears of man and impossible to reveal
to a Christian public,” or simply “an array of magic rites drawn from the most
ignorant and stupid classes.”4 Yet in our own generation, Tantra has been praised as “a
cult of ecstasy, focused on a vision of cosmic sexuality,” and as a much needed
celebration of the body, sexuality, and material existence.
This ambivalence has grown even more intense in our own
day. On the one hand, the scholarly literature often laments that Tantra has
been woefully neglected in the study of Asian religions as “the unwanted stepchild
of Hindu studies.” It would seem that Tantra is anything but neglected in
modern discourse. Tantra has become among the most marketable aspects of the “exotic
Orient.” Tantra has by no means been repressed or marginalized; on the contrary,
like sex itself, Tantra has become the subject of an endless proliferation of
discourse and exploited as “the secret.” Tantra represents the ideal religion
for contemporary Western society. A religion that seems to combine spirituality
with sensuality, and mystical experience with wine, women, and wealth, Tantra
could be called the ideal path for spiritual consumers in the strange world of “late
capitalism.”
But despite the contradictory and wildly diverse
constructions of Tantra, both popular and scholarly, there is still one key
element that all of these imaginings share, namely, the very extremity of Tantra, its radical Otherness, the fact that it is
considered to be the most radical aspect of Indian spirituality, the one most
diametrically opposed to the modern West.
The India of Orientalist scholarship was constructed as
the quintessential Other in comparison to the West. Conceived as an essentially
passionate, irrational, effeminate world, a land of “disorderly imagination,”
India was set in opposition to the progressive, rational, masculine, and
scientific world of modern Europe. And Tantra was quickly singled out as India’s darkest, most irrational
element— as the Extreme Orient, the most exotic aspect of the exotic Orient
itself.
Tantra is a far messier product of the mirroring and
misrepresentation at work between both East and West. It is a dialectical
category—similar to what Walter Benjamin has called a dialectical image—born out of the mirroring and mimesis that goes on
between Western and Indian minds. Neither simply the result of an indigenous
evolution nor a mere Orientalist fabrication, Tantra is a shifting amalgam of
fantasies, fears, and wish fulfillments, at once native and Other, which
strikes to the heart of our constructions of the exotic Orient and of the
contemporary West.
The moment one hears the word “Tantrism,” various wild
and lurid associations spring forth in the Western mind which add up to a
pastiche of psychospiritual science fiction and sexual acrobatics that would put
to shame the most imaginative of our contemporary pornographers.
Comments
Post a Comment
If you want more information, please let me know.