Report Abuse

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Followers

Blog Archive

Blog Archive

Categories

Labels

Popular Posts

BTemplates.com

Pages

About

BTemplates.com

Blogroll

Blogroll

Tantras are techniques – the oldest, most ancient techniques. Tantra is five thousand years old. Nothing can be added; there is no possibility to add anything. It is exhaustive, complete.
Tantra is not religion, this is science. No belief is needed.
There are one hundred twelve techniques in tantra. These one hundred and twelve methods of meditation constitute the whole science of transforming mind.
Skip to main content

"Khajuraho & Tantrism"



The Kandariya Mahadeo and other temples at Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh are rightly famous for their exquisitely crafted erotic sculptures. They belong to a class of architecture that includes, among other examples, the well known Konarak temple in Orissa. The question that arises is why such explicit maithuna themes were depicted on religious edifices. Could they possibly be the expression of Tantric ideology?

An authority on the Tantric cult, Agehananda Bharati has without qualification called these temples ‘Tantric”. Other scholars, Indian and Western, have not, however, been so definite; some have, in fact, denied that they could be Tantric. There are still others who have called them obscene, though there is quite patently a vast gulf between the blase, dehumanizing efforts of Playboy magazine and its clones, and these tender and sublime religious sculptures.

Perhaps one reason why scholars have hesitated to call these sculptures Tantric lies in the cultural attitudes they hold. Many western scholars are quite possibly influenced by their Christian traditions: in Christianity, religion has a lot to do with morality, which is not the case in Hinduism. Thus, persons brought up in the Judaeo-Christian tradition would possibly find it difficult to appreciate the use of amoral, erotic methods in religious experimentation.

The question then arises why Indians should also share this value-system. The answer is perhaps equally obvious. The official culture of India has been deeply influenced by two centuries of catechization, conscious and unconscious, by British missionaries and administrators; and before that, there was the influence of seven centuries of rule by Muslims, whose ideology is similarly "Mediterranean”. Further, Indians suffer from a deep anxiety-syndrome regarding the loss of the semen virile; this fear is linked, among other things, to the magical, cross-culturally documented fear of loss of soul. These two strands of asceticism were brought together in the Victorian personality of Mohandas Gandhi, who has had a tremendous effect on recent generations of Indians. Gandhi’s opinions have been criticized only by an intellectual like M. N. Roy, who pointed out, for example, that Gandhi even wanted to deface the Khajuraho sculptures! This shamefaced attitude is shared by most Indian scholars.

Let us now look at the social history of these temples. They were built under the aegis of the Chandella rulers of Bundelkhand, who were the dominant regional power in the tenth and eleventh centuries. They built these magnificent temples partly to acquire religious merit, and partly to symbolize their power.

It is possible that the Chandellas were of tribal origin, as Pramod Chandra points out. That whole region of India has even today a large concentration of tribal groups; besides, this phenomenon of lower-ranked tribal and other social groups forming royal dynasties is not uncommon in Indian history. These and similar groups did not share the ascetic world-view of the mainstream Indian societies.

This is so even today in the matrifocal areas of India, viz. Kerala, Orissa, Bengal and Assam. In these comparatively open societies, Tantrism has survived even into modem times; and in medieval times, this cult had an even wider spread, extending into Kashmir and even into areas that are now in Pakistan. The point is that a powerful royal dynasty, in a social milieu that was much less puritanical than that of modem India, had the wherewithal and the psychological security to depict Tantric rites sculpturally, assuming that the rulers or their acharyas were members of the cult. If they were there was precious little that the establishment, i.e. Brahmans and others, could have done, especially if these temples were private shrines for royalty, as has been argued.

Let us come now to the specific opinions of art historians and other scholars. Pramod Chandra feels that the Khajuraho erotica were the work of Kaula and Kapalika cults. (Without going into the exact nature of these cults, one may generally agree that they were Tantric.) Chandra feels that the ideology of these cults was above reproach, being aimed at moksha, or “salvation”. He, however, feels that these cults “degenerated” in time and became licentious. Such emotive terms, however, should give one pause: can one divine another’s inner experiences (especially ineffable ones like the mystical), and then magisterially distinguish “proper” from “improper”? As Bharati rightly points out, mysticism cannot be qualified as either “proper” or “improper”; it is either “genuine” or “spurious”. Perhaps, as he also points out, what people resent here is the personal autonomy generated by the mystical experience, whether obtained by Tantric or other means.


View this post on Instagram

Ancient history of Khajuraho the Chandela rulers built the enthralling temples at Khajuraho over a period of 100 years from 950 AD to 1050 AD. Khajuraho was the cultural capital of the Chandela Rajputs, the Hindu dynasty that ruled over the region from the 10th-12th centuries. The political capital of the Chandelas was Kalinjar. Later the capital was moved to Mahoba, but Khajuraho continued to find patronage for some time. It fell into neglect and dispair much later by medieval period.The most intriguing aspect about these temples is the choice of location, as there is nothing exceptional about Khajuraho as a place nor is there as sizeable population around the city. The Chandelas were followers of the Tantric cult, which believed that gratification of earthly desires is the first step towards salvation. The legend says that these erotic sculptures were intended as a part of a lesson for young boys in Brahmacharya stage to train them for family life in the Grihasta stage. เค–เคœुเคฐाเคนो เค•ा เคช्เคฐाเคšीเคจ เค‡เคคिเคนाเคธ เคšंเคฆेเคฒ เคถाเคธเค•ों เคจे เค–เคœुเคฐाเคนो เคฎें 950 เคˆเคฆ เคธे 1050 เคˆเคธ्เคตी เคคเค• 100 เคตเคฐ्เคทों เค•ी เค…เคตเคงि เคฎें เคšिเคค्เคคाเค•เคฐ्เคทเค• เคฎंเคฆिเคฐों เค•ा เคจिเคฐ्เคฎाเคฃ เค•िเคฏा। เค–เคœुเคฐाเคนो เคšंเคฆela เคฐाเคœเคชूเคคों เค•ी เคธांเคธ्เค•ृเคคिเค• เคฐाเคœเคงाเคจी เคฅी, เคนिंเคฆू เคตंเคถ เคœिเคธเคจे เค‡เคธ เค•्เคทेเคค्เคฐ เคชเคฐ 10 เคตीं -12 เคตीं เคธเคฆी เคธे เคถाเคธเคจ เค•िเคฏा เคฅा। เคšंเคฆेเคฒ เค•ी เคฐाเคœเคจीเคคिเค• เคฐाเคœเคงाเคจी เค•ाเคฒिंเคœเคฐ เคฅा। เคฌाเคฆ เคฎें เคฐाเคœเคงाเคจी เคฎเคนोเคฌा เคฎें เคฒे เคœाเคˆ เค—เคˆ, เคฒेเค•िเคจ เค–เคœुเคฐाเคนो เค•ुเค› เคธเคฎเคฏ เค•े เคฒिเค เคธंเคฐเค•्เคทเคฃ เคคเคฒाเคถ เคฐเคนा เคฅा। เคฏเคน เคฆुเคฐ्เคฒเคญ เคนो เค—เคฏा เค”เคฐ เคฎเคง्เคฏเคฏुเค—ीเคจ เค•ाเคฒ เค•े เคฌाเคฆ เคฎें เคฌเคนुเคค เค…เคงिเค• เคธ्เคฅाเคจांเคคเคฐिเคค เคนो เค—เคฏा। เค‡เคจ เคฎंเคฆिเคฐों เค•े เคฌाเคฐे เคฎें เคธเคฌเคธे เคฆिเคฒเคšเคธ्เคช เคชเคนเคฒू เคธ्เคฅाเคจ เค•ा เคตिเค•เคฒ्เคช เคนै, เค•्เคฏोंเค•ि เคตเคนां เค–เคœुเคฐाเคนो เค•े เคฌाเคฐे เคฎें เค•ोเคˆ เคธ्เคฅाเคจ เคจเคนीं เคนै เค”เคฐ เคจ เคนी เคถเคนเคฐ เค•े เค†เคธเคชाเคธ เค•ाเคซी เค†เคฌाเคฆी เคนै। เคšंเคกेเคฒเคธ เคคांเคค्เคฐिเค• เคชंเคฅ เค•े เค…เคจुเคฏाเคฏी เคฅे, เคœो เคฎाเคจเคคे เคฅे เค•ि เคธांเคธाเคฐिเค• เค‡เคš्เค›ाเค“ं เค•ो เคคृเคช्เคคि เคฎुเค•्เคคि เค•ी เค“เคฐ เคชเคนเคฒा เค•เคฆเคฎ เคนै। เค•เคฅा เค•เคนเคคी เคนै เค•ि เคฏे เค•ाเคฎुเค• เคฎूเคฐ्เคคिเคฏां เคฌ्เคฐเคน्เคฎเคšाเคฐ เคšเคฐเคฃ เคฎें เคฏुเคตा เคฒเคก़เค•ों เค•े เคฒिเค เคเค• เคธเคฌเค• เค•े เคฐूเคช เคฎें เคฒเค•्เคทिเคค เคฅीं เคคाเค•ि เค‰เคจ्เคนें เค—ृเคนเคธ्เคฅ เคชเคฐिเคตाเคฐ เคฎें เคชเคฐिเคตाเคฐ เค•े เคฒिเค เคช्เคฐเคถिเค•्เคทिเคค เค•िเคฏा เคœा เคธเค•े।

A post shared by Khajuraho Temple (@khajuraho_temple) on

The word ‘tantra’ means technique, the method, the path. So it is not philosophical – note this. It is not concerned with intellectual problems and inquiries. It is not concerned with the ”why” of things, it is concerned with ”how”; not with what is truth, but how the truth can be attained. TANTRA means technique. So this treatise is a scientific one. Science is not concerned with why, science is concerned with how. Tantra is science, tantra is not philosophy. To understand philosophy is easy because only your intellect is required. You will need a change... rather, a mutation.

Comments